If you've arrived via a link and you want to see all the latest posts: Click here
Showing posts with label Driving. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Driving. Show all posts
Tuesday, 2 September 2008
Talking about the Manchester Congestion Charge
There's been a lot of talk about how people living on the outskirts of Manchester would be impacted by the ridiculous idea that is the congestion charge.
But there's not been much talk about how it impacts a place like Macclesfield - and this is a real shame.
Cinemacc aside, you really need to travel to Stockport of Didsbury if you want to go to the flicks. Most people go to Didsbury, because Parrswood's a nicer location than Stockport. However - under the proposals you'll need to ensure it's a later showing unless you want to get caught in the charge.
In a similar way we normally travel to Manchester to see something on the stage. It's a shame that there's not something on at Mads every night, but that's the way it is. If we want to go for a meal first then we'll need to pay the congestion charge. Get the train? Fair enough as long as you want to come home before last orders....
I've got a suspicion that I'll be returning to this.
But there's not been much talk about how it impacts a place like Macclesfield - and this is a real shame.
Cinemacc aside, you really need to travel to Stockport of Didsbury if you want to go to the flicks. Most people go to Didsbury, because Parrswood's a nicer location than Stockport. However - under the proposals you'll need to ensure it's a later showing unless you want to get caught in the charge.
In a similar way we normally travel to Manchester to see something on the stage. It's a shame that there's not something on at Mads every night, but that's the way it is. If we want to go for a meal first then we'll need to pay the congestion charge. Get the train? Fair enough as long as you want to come home before last orders....
I've got a suspicion that I'll be returning to this.
Labels:
Congestion Charge,
Driving
Thursday, 28 August 2008
Checking the Flowerpot Junction for Lines
It's getting a bit daft now. All I'm after is a few white lines on the road, where they were supposed to be in the first place, and it almost seems an impossibility.
Work on the junction was completed in February, but we didn't get our right turn lane.
So I chase up Highways in April to find out what went wrong. They promised me lines in two to three months. I thought that seemed a bit slow considering they were supposed to be done in February, but understood the reasoning that they wanted to ensure any plans were safe.
When I checked at the end of June I was told it would now be early August. Now I'm being told it will be the end of August / beginning of September - but will definitely be done at the same time as the lines outside the College.
Last night I'm driving down Park Lane and I see the chappie painting lines outside the college. So I hop out the car to see if he's doing the flowerpot after.
Surprise, surprise, he doesn't know a thing about it.
If this goes on for much longer then I'll be up there with a tin of gloss....
Work on the junction was completed in February, but we didn't get our right turn lane.
So I chase up Highways in April to find out what went wrong. They promised me lines in two to three months. I thought that seemed a bit slow considering they were supposed to be done in February, but understood the reasoning that they wanted to ensure any plans were safe.
When I checked at the end of June I was told it would now be early August. Now I'm being told it will be the end of August / beginning of September - but will definitely be done at the same time as the lines outside the College.
Last night I'm driving down Park Lane and I see the chappie painting lines outside the college. So I hop out the car to see if he's doing the flowerpot after.
Surprise, surprise, he doesn't know a thing about it.
If this goes on for much longer then I'll be up there with a tin of gloss....
Saturday, 16 August 2008
Worrying about parking - part 2
The recent decriminalization of parking in Macclesfield (which sounds counter-intuitive as it has lead to more tickets) as angered some as they feel it's no longer possible to pop into the shops in town.
These people are the minority - the majority that I have spoken to are pleased with the new system. They are pleased that whilst they always parked where they should they saw a small number of lazy, inconsiderate people breaking the rules. Rules that are not put in place to make life difficult, but to keep traffic flowing and make life easier for all.
They are also pleased that there are now more places you can stop if you want to pop into the shops. Short term bays, many of which are free, which used to be full of people parking all day are now available for what they were designed for.
So in the next few years, the outlook for parking in Macclesfield is good.
But what about the medium and long term? I have been digesting the plans for the new town centre and was immediately concerned about the amount of parking available. The new development will be built over three existing car parks and the plans I was sent didn't show a significant number of car spaces. Fortunately, I have been told this was because I wasn't sent plans for all the levels of the car park. I will look forward to ensuring that we end up with more spaces in the new development - because if we want more shops to encourage more visitors, then we certainly need more space.
Cost is another thing that bothers me greatly. I have got confirmation from MBC that the new car park will be run by a private operator. This immediately struck fear into my heart as I thought of a NCP wannabe taking hold of Macclesfield Town centre and bleeding us dry with exorbitant charges. Fortunately again, I have been told I will be proved wrong. The contract and charges will be set the council (which by that point will by Cheshire East, and not MBC) - so we have a chance to do this right.
We should consider this carefully, and if we are serious about competing with the Trafford Centre, where parking is free, then we must offer similar prices.
Short term parking must be free.
There is not much argument in Macclesfield for getting people out of their cars and onto public transport. This is a very rural area and the population is greatly dispersed. It is not possible to have buses to serve every road of every ward - and those that do cannot offer fast, frequent services.
We must not provide a disincentive for visiting our new town centre. Even a small charge will keep people away, so lets have no charge at all.
But my last worry is the biggest of the lot. When you consider that we are building this huge project over three of the car parks in Macclesfield (which are often well used when you visit them) - where are we going to park whilst the development is taking place?
These people are the minority - the majority that I have spoken to are pleased with the new system. They are pleased that whilst they always parked where they should they saw a small number of lazy, inconsiderate people breaking the rules. Rules that are not put in place to make life difficult, but to keep traffic flowing and make life easier for all.
They are also pleased that there are now more places you can stop if you want to pop into the shops. Short term bays, many of which are free, which used to be full of people parking all day are now available for what they were designed for.
So in the next few years, the outlook for parking in Macclesfield is good.
But what about the medium and long term? I have been digesting the plans for the new town centre and was immediately concerned about the amount of parking available. The new development will be built over three existing car parks and the plans I was sent didn't show a significant number of car spaces. Fortunately, I have been told this was because I wasn't sent plans for all the levels of the car park. I will look forward to ensuring that we end up with more spaces in the new development - because if we want more shops to encourage more visitors, then we certainly need more space.
Cost is another thing that bothers me greatly. I have got confirmation from MBC that the new car park will be run by a private operator. This immediately struck fear into my heart as I thought of a NCP wannabe taking hold of Macclesfield Town centre and bleeding us dry with exorbitant charges. Fortunately again, I have been told I will be proved wrong. The contract and charges will be set the council (which by that point will by Cheshire East, and not MBC) - so we have a chance to do this right.
We should consider this carefully, and if we are serious about competing with the Trafford Centre, where parking is free, then we must offer similar prices.
Short term parking must be free.
There is not much argument in Macclesfield for getting people out of their cars and onto public transport. This is a very rural area and the population is greatly dispersed. It is not possible to have buses to serve every road of every ward - and those that do cannot offer fast, frequent services.
We must not provide a disincentive for visiting our new town centre. Even a small charge will keep people away, so lets have no charge at all.
But my last worry is the biggest of the lot. When you consider that we are building this huge project over three of the car parks in Macclesfield (which are often well used when you visit them) - where are we going to park whilst the development is taking place?
Labels:
Driving,
Town Centre
Friday, 15 August 2008
Worrying about parking - part 1
The motor car gave us freedom to travel where and when we wanted, but it's also given us the stress of having to find somewhere to leave our autos whenever we get to our destination. I've always thought that paying for parking was a difficult thing to deal with. It's a great way to promote the use of other transport methods, but it can be seen as just plain fraud when there's no other option.
I traveled recently to nearby Manchester Airport (which is about 100 metres outside the Authority of which I'm a member) to pick up my wife. I was disgusted to find that whilst you could drop passengers off free of charge, in order to collect someone you had to enter the short stay carpark. The cost to drive in and out of this car park (for I didn't even need to stop the engine) was £2. Considering that there's no other option, and public transport from the Airport to Macclesfield is poor, I considered this daylight robbery.
I was even more incensed when I asked a parking attendant why we now had to pay to collect passengers. I was told this was because of terrorism. I can certainly understand the desire to have a collection area aware from the terminal after what happened at Glasgow airport, but it doesn't justify charging for it.
At Geneva airport you must use the short stay car park to collect passengers. Here, they only charge you if you stay longer than a short period (I think it's 15 minutes). At Salt Lake City there is a carpark on the outskirts of the airport where you can wait in your car until your passengers are ready. There are large signs which display when the flights are collecting their luggage, so you can go and collect your friends and relatives. The system works perfectly.
Poor services with shameless money making under a guise of national security is nothing but a national embarrassment.
The lie is so transparent the staff of the airport must surely be embarrassed, but the management is prepared to continue it in order to justify an additional unofficial tax on passengers.
They'll be charging for chairs in the departure lounge next.
£2 is not a significant amount of money, but it's the concept of paying that can be a disincentive. Even when a car park is cheap it is still a barrier from visiting somewhere. This has crystalised some important concepts in my mind for Macclesfield Town centre.
To be continued...
I traveled recently to nearby Manchester Airport (which is about 100 metres outside the Authority of which I'm a member) to pick up my wife. I was disgusted to find that whilst you could drop passengers off free of charge, in order to collect someone you had to enter the short stay carpark. The cost to drive in and out of this car park (for I didn't even need to stop the engine) was £2. Considering that there's no other option, and public transport from the Airport to Macclesfield is poor, I considered this daylight robbery.
I was even more incensed when I asked a parking attendant why we now had to pay to collect passengers. I was told this was because of terrorism. I can certainly understand the desire to have a collection area aware from the terminal after what happened at Glasgow airport, but it doesn't justify charging for it.
At Geneva airport you must use the short stay car park to collect passengers. Here, they only charge you if you stay longer than a short period (I think it's 15 minutes). At Salt Lake City there is a carpark on the outskirts of the airport where you can wait in your car until your passengers are ready. There are large signs which display when the flights are collecting their luggage, so you can go and collect your friends and relatives. The system works perfectly.
Poor services with shameless money making under a guise of national security is nothing but a national embarrassment.
The lie is so transparent the staff of the airport must surely be embarrassed, but the management is prepared to continue it in order to justify an additional unofficial tax on passengers.
They'll be charging for chairs in the departure lounge next.
£2 is not a significant amount of money, but it's the concept of paying that can be a disincentive. Even when a car park is cheap it is still a barrier from visiting somewhere. This has crystalised some important concepts in my mind for Macclesfield Town centre.
To be continued...
Labels:
Driving,
Town Centre
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
